Rediscovering Babu Rajendra Prasad
This story has its origins
quite long ago. Sometime in 1988 or 1989 I was sent on deputation as a
temporary Branch Manager of State Bank of India, Pothia (in Katihar District, Bihar).
This particular branch lay far from the beaten track and since the incumbent
Branch Manager desperately needed leave, which could not be granted without his
handing over charge to someone, I was asked to take-over. I was then posted at
the nearby SBI Branch in Kursela.
I had believed that Kursela was the end of the civilized world as I
then knew it, because I had not yet seen Pothia.
For the uninitiated, being posted to Purnea
Module of SBI was bad enough (referred to as a Kala Pani posting). Thereafter,
being sent to Kursela was the ultimate in
bad-luck or insult. Kursela happened to
be about one and half hour by road from Purnea.
Pothia was reached by traveling down a
side road (today I would call it a dirt track) from Kursela for another 12 – 13 kms.
I commuted to Pothia by bus from Kursela, the only available public transport.
It was a old, cankerous bus, hand painted in red which left Kursela at about 8 in the morning and took
about an hour to reach Pothia before
meandering off to some place I never ventured out to explore. The bus used to be
full both inside and outside with people and their effects (bags, trussed
sacks, wicker baskets of chickens, goats, market produce etc. etc.). With
people clinging to every possible hand-hold, toe hold, and foot hold, it was
difficult to see the actual bus. How I wish I had had a camera to record it!
On my first journey from
Kursela to Pothia, I had much difficulty in getting inside
the bus. But on the return journey, one of my staff members had informed the
driver or the conductor that I was the “Manager Saheb”,
so I was given a seat. Thereafter, howsoever crowded the bus was, I used to be
given a seat and in case there was no seats
to be had, I used to share the driver’s seat!
Work load at Pothia was
light and time lay heavy on my hands, legs, body and mind. Then I chanced upon a
copy of M J Akbar’s “India the Siege
Within” lying somewhere in the Branch, though no one had any idea how it had
reached there. For want of anything better I started reading the book and
finished it over the four – five days or so I spent in Pothia. And I got hooked to Akbar’s writings.
In due course I tried to read all his other writings and in the process came
across his book “Nehru – The Making of India”.
In this book, Akbar endorses the historian S Gopal’s view of Dr.
Rajendra Prasad as a person with “inferior intellectual quality” and “a social
outlook which belonged to the eighteenth century” (page 459). This was jarring,
to say the least, specially to a Bihari Kayastha
like me. I had grown up believing that the greatest nationalist leaders
after Gandhiji were Babu Rajendra Prasad and Jayaprakash Narayan along with of course Pandit
Nehru and Sardar Patel. The rest of the freedom fighter fraternity fell in a
lower order of beings. While, JP forsake formal
politics in favour of nation building
through the Sarvodaya movement, Rajendra Babu provided the stability and
perfect foil for Nehruji in the building
of a modern India. His sterling contribution in the making of the Indian
Constitution is also well known.
Akbar’s viewpoint was
quite upsetting as it went counter to all that I heard or knew about Rajendra Babu. The impressions I carried about
Rajendra Babu included on how he came up from a humble rural background, how he
always topped his class, his exemplary scholastic record at Calcutta
University, his taking up law, and then leaving legal practice to devote
himself fully in the freedom struggle, and lastly (the ultimate) how he came
back and spent the remaining years of his life in two rooms in Sadaqat Ashram after completing his term as
President of India (Will somebody tell this to Pratibha Patil?).
However, by this time I
was so enamoured by Akbar’s writings that I somewhat grudgingly though hesitantly
accepted his (and Gopal’s) views on Rajendra
Babu’s intellectual capacity.
Akbar’s book on Nehru
prompted me to read Nehruji’s “Autobiography”
and “Discovery of India”. I was very much impressed by both these books. Not
just in terms of Nehru’s command over language, but also the glimpses which
these books gave to Nehru’s depth, vision, and passion. This was even more commendable
since both the books were written in prison where Nehru had limited resources
available in terms of research material, books etc. Since then I have been a
big supporter of Nehru and believe these two books should be read by all
educated Indians, a view point I share with all and sundry. My ardour for Akbar's writings also remains intact.
I had very little
personal knowledge about Rajendra Prasad except what one heard bandied about,
and the little that is mentioned in school history books. I had read his book
“Satyagrah in Champaran”, which suggested a sincere person of gentle nature.
There was nothing which was very forceful about it. Later I read the English
translation of his book Gandhiji ke Kadmon
Mein (In the Footsteps of Gandhiji) which reinforced the same impression.
Someone, who was sincere, down-to-earth, and committed. I did not give much
thought to Rajendra Babu’s intellectual accomplishments or acumen.
Recently, in September
2012, I chanced on Rajendra Prasad’s
autobiography published by Penguin. The original version was written in Hindi,
but the English translation has the benefit of having been edited by Rajendra Babu himself. I was not even aware
that Rajendra Babu had written his
autobiography. Out of sheer curiosity, I purchased the book and read it. A
simple story, without embellishments, narrated with a lot of humility. But it whetted
my interest, and thanks to the wonderful powers of the net downloaded another
book of his, titled “India Divided’. This book puts forth the pros and cons for
creation of Pakistan
and was written in the early forties, i.e., before Pakistan became a reality but when
the possibility was being widely discussed. I was really struck by the depth of
research and understanding of the person who had written it. The book is
ponderous and takes some time and effort going through. However, it examines
the whole issue of the rationale for creation of Pakistan. Dr. Prasad, places not
just his own views, but also the viewpoint of nearly all major players of the
time, some of which are quite critical and contrary to his viewpoint. He quotes
extensively from various sources with the intention of giving the reader a
complete perspective, so that the reader can then make a considered opinion.
This book was not written by a man with “inferior intellectual quality”, or
someone who lacked either passion, or a mind of his own.
Maybe Rajendra Babu lacked the world view or sophistication of Nehru, but he did not lack depth. And as one of the organisation men of the Congress he was instrumental in carrying the flock together and maintaining the gears of the Congress machinery moving. Anyone who has ever participated in management of his or her housing society would appreciate how difficult it is to coordinate the views of a group of people, all with strong viewpoints!
Dedication of India Divided
Maybe Rajendra Babu lacked the world view or sophistication of Nehru, but he did not lack depth. And as one of the organisation men of the Congress he was instrumental in carrying the flock together and maintaining the gears of the Congress machinery moving. Anyone who has ever participated in management of his or her housing society would appreciate how difficult it is to coordinate the views of a group of people, all with strong viewpoints!
Is it because of Babu Rajendra Prasad’s inherent humility that he has
been interpreted by both Gopal and M J Akbar as being a person with “inferior
intellectual quality”?